Why not JPG?

Messages are moved here (should anyone ever want to see them again) once they are no longer applicable to the current version (e.g. suggestions that have been implemented or bugs that have been fixed).

Moderator: George Gilbert

Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Zed5Duke
Um Master
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Darkmoond

Why not JPG?

Post by Zed5Duke »

RTC use only BMP files, and they are too heavy when you try made some new custom graphics. This program should use more graphics formats like JPG.
User avatar
George Gilbert
Dungeon Master
Posts: 3022
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:04 am
Location: London, England
Contact:

Post by George Gilbert »

RTC already accepts PNG files - that gives you *lossless* compression as well as alpha channels etc...

Adding a JPEG library to it would only bloat the download and wouldn't give you anything extra in return!
User avatar
Gambit37
Should eat more pies
Posts: 13714
Joined: Wed May 31, 2000 1:57 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Post by Gambit37 »

JPG is a terrible format to use for game assets due to artifacting/averaging that happens during the compression process and it's not used in any game anywhere that I can think of except for pre-rendered backdrops such as Resident Evil.

Absoutely awful for game assets that need to be scaled. NO NO NO! :evil:

With compressible PNGs and the compressions that RTC can make on BMPs, we don't need any more formats in my opinion. Yes, JPEGs would be smaller than equivalent PNGs, but they'll look awful.
User avatar
linflas
My other avatar is gay
Posts: 2445
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 9:58 pm
Location: Lille, France
Contact:

Post by linflas »

have you ever seen a bad compressed JPG in 640x480 resolution ? *eeeeeek* ! :)
User avatar
Zed5Duke
Um Master
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Darkmoond

Post by Zed5Duke »

Yes, thats true JPGs has some bad quality. I will try PNG then
Post Reply