Page 7 of 11

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:09 pm
by Gambit37
I did spot the gigantic pattern in your contributions last week. At first I thought I was going mad, but careful perusal did indeed confirm your gigantic additions. Please continue ;-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:06 pm
by Gambit37
It's just me and you, Beo. Just me and you now. *stares*

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:07 pm
by beowuuf
Lol well it will be if we keep singing Gangnam style!

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:09 am
by Seriously Unserious
Gambit37 wrote:That looks very festive; nice! :-)

And I'm pleased to say we now have a story hook: forthcoming horrors to be bestowed on Hawk! :-)
Thanks, I found a site with plenty more cool smilies to choose from. Of course, you've probably seen a few of the choices from my recent, smilie-crazed posts. :D

And yeah, looks like that Hawk theme's caught on in the story. 8)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:12 pm
by Gambit37
"Nothing!" replied Hawk's slippers's owner's pet's ostrich-like bandicoot.
Getting a little bonkers with the possessives....!

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:11 pm
by beowuuf
Says the person who added pet's :p

And so it's being said the bandicoot of Hawk's pet, what's wrong with that :) It just took a couple of extra steps to get there :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:16 pm
by Gambit37
Indeed :-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:00 pm
by Seriously Unserious
Gambit, looks like we did a double post in the story thread, but somehow they work fine anyways, as they are :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:01 pm
by Gambit37
Yup, a happy collision :-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 11:05 pm
by beowuuf
We seem to be getting lucky with our double posts! Antmen endoursed cheques works out even better than credit cards being endorsed :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:08 am
by Seriously Unserious
yeah, it looks like we've been vacationing on the Island of Serendipity this holiday season. :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:22 am
by beowuuf
And we have our Christmas story title!

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:25 am
by beowuuf
Yes, I pulled a Gambit and did two words. Everyone knows 'The Hoff' is The Hoff's proper nick-name :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:30 am
by Seriously Unserious
2 words in a 1-word-only thread?! :shock:

Image tisk, tisk Image

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:31 am
by Gambit37
Perfectly valid when it's a proper name ;-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:33 am
by beowuuf
Gambit started it! Image


Edit: Exactly what he said! Image

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:35 am
by Seriously Unserious
gambit37 wrote:Perfectly valid when it's a proper name ;-)
:lol: I know, I was just looking for an excuse to use a waggling finger smilie, and beo gave me the perfect one. :P

speaking of perfect, we're a perfect 2 for 2 on double postings in the story thread that work. Image

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:36 am
by beowuuf
Lol, more like 4 for 4! Or if you mean us today, then woohoo!

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:38 am
by Seriously Unserious
I was referring only to the 2 double postings me and gambit have had today. If we count all of them up I know the number would be much higher but I'm just to lazy to bother. :P

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:39 am
by beowuuf
Yup, then it's two for that. I've already added the title to the summary post in honour of this! :)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:43 am
by Seriously Unserious
actually, it's now 3 for 3 for me'n'gambit... I think... :?

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:51 am
by Gambit37
Um, someone messed up. I suppose I need to change my "pendulum" for it to now make sense?

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:53 am
by Seriously Unserious
I think we just broke our perfect record of double posts that work. The story thread's been going crazy with activity today. :lol:

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:58 am
by oh_brother
I think if pendulum was changed into an adjective it would make sense again (in as much as it ever made sense!)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:59 am
by Gambit37
Done. Now "pendulous" ;-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:01 am
by Seriously Unserious
at least the sentence would be more or less, somewhat, in some way, grammatically correct -- sort of.

:?


:? I think. :?

:?

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:05 am
by Gambit37
Dairy-based? Hmmm. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. *Stares at oh_brother* ...... ;-)

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:07 am
by Seriously Unserious
I think we've lost our double posting magic now. me and beo just had a double posting go sideways on us now, which needs to be fixed. :?

EDIT: OK, I fixed my half of the double posting into the possessive form, so it should now fit in.

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:09 am
by Gambit37
I dunno "dairy-based bottles opposition" sort of works :-)

If oh_brother can have "dairy-based" then I'm definitely having the Sophia specific "giga-gigglers"! :D

Re: The Silly and Tiny Christmas Story Discussion 2006 / 201

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:10 am
by oh_brother
What's wrong with dairy-based? It is a compound adjective, and can be followed easily by any noun! :)