Google enhances search for Firefox users

Chat about new breakthroughs in technology and science. Or even about cool stuff that happened in the past...
Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gambit37
Should eat more pies
Posts: 13720
Joined: Wed May 31, 2000 1:57 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Google enhances search for Firefox users

Post by Gambit37 »

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,3902 ... 410,00.htm

I think this is rather silly of Google. Here's my view on it.

In Firefox, prefetch is on by default. It should be off by default. These things should always be opt in, not opt out.

The average user won't even know that prefetch is happening and won't think to read a FAQ to find out about something like that.

So Google are utilising prefetch on the search results? Let's say the first result returned is a site with hundreds of pornographic images on it, and the browser starts caching that without the user knowing. Say also that they are on dial up. Now let's say that the user clicks the fifth result in the search listing. The broswer has just downloaded a whole bunch of rubbish the user didn't want and it's clogged up their machine and maybe also eaten into a monthly transfer allocation.

Why should the user have to suffer degraded pc and net performance for something that they haven't chosen?

I think that prefetching is wonderful idea when implemented properly on a site I have already opted to view. But not in a search page -- that's just dumb. At the very least, there should be a way of blocking certain sites from utilising prefetch, but allowing others.

I generally have applauded Google's innovations over the years but this one sucks big fat ass. :evil:
User avatar
FallenSeraphin
Adept
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:56 pm
Location: Portugal

Post by FallenSeraphin »

Nowadays everyone has P4's or AmdXp's 2k+ and broadband... all except me... *sobs incontrolably*
" Never Fear Death, Embrace It As You Embrace Darkness... "
Guest

Post by Guest »

This is lunacy. Just when onlinesecurity was taking a step in the right direction, the world's most popular search engine compromises it.
User avatar
Toni Y
Adept
Posts: 221
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:54 am
Location: Finland

Post by Toni Y »

I think it's a good idea. But I defiently agree that it ought to be opt-in instead of opt-out.

For me it's beneficial in general, I got 8Mbit downband, unlimited transfer and keep 1GB webcache so I won't be glogged at any stage. :)
Toni Ylisirniö
Author of Grave of King Millias, Return of Chaos, and DM2 dungeons.
User avatar
FallenSeraphin
Adept
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:56 pm
Location: Portugal

Post by FallenSeraphin »

What ??? i want it tooooooooo :cry: *hates Toni Y for life*
" Never Fear Death, Embrace It As You Embrace Darkness... "
User avatar
Des
Um Master
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Southampton, UK

Post by Des »

Interesting that it puts a prefix on the retrieved files - so no get out clause for future Gary Glitters!
Post Reply