http://greatgrossout.com/content/entry-16
moo

(most gross and scary - least votes.This creature is called Chemicrow. It is a mutant creature that evoled from a crow - because of stuff like the oil spills and all the chemicals that go into our air - these are the types of birds we will be seeing in the future if we don't take care of the planet. Chemicrow lives in mostly in Canada and the United States. Because there will be very few trees left on the planet, the Chemicrow is forced to eat junk and garbage left behind. It doesn't get very big or live for very long because of it's bad diet. It doesn't get the proper vitamins and clean water it needs to grow. Chemicrow can hardly fly because it's wings did not get properly developed.
I think you misunderstood. I generally agree with your assertions about a 6 year old's world view. My point definitely wasn't that his entry was without merit. In fact I wasn't making that kind of judgement at all. Rather, I was saying that the entries should be evaluated fairly, based on merit, and the winner should the be the person that the most people actually who looked at the entries actually chose-- i.e., the entire point of voting for a winner in the first place. The winner should not the entry that can get the largest effort of "hey, go vote for my friend" mobilized. That's the sort of vote-funneling effort which has nothing to do with the quality whatsoever, and that's what I was talking about. Rather than being based on merit, the winner is being based on who can get the biggest PR machine going.cowsmanaut wrote:Seriously..? Merit??
A fair point, but how is it that much different for the mommy and daddy and friends to troll the net and funnel in votes from people who would otherwise have absolutely nothing to do with this contest, and aren't likely to evaluate any of the entries fairly?cowsmanaut wrote:I know he's 6, I know he tried his best.. and that his dad made him do it all by himself. I'm also sure he's competing with people twice his age and that anyone of them could have had help from mommy or daddy..
Yeah, everyone else is doing it, so you either do the same thing or you've got no chance. This definitely sounds a lot like politics.cowsmanaut wrote:it's not much different from my attempting to get him more votes via posting here. However, that's kind of my point. each one of those in the top likely had the same game plan of voting through their own public relations.. so why not him?
I don't know, it seems like a lot of people would just click the link that they're directed to and then forget all about it. Of course, that does happen to still be one more step than most advertising involves-- that is, going straight to "forget all about it."cowsmanaut wrote:The point of the people's choice aspect and why they included the "post this on facebook" button.. is to get advertisement .. so the more people who see it, the more people who see metropolis which is good advertisment for their kids parties and such.. so the more people you show it too then the more advertising they get.. So, that means you're safe to vote for him because he's completing the function they intended..
Yupcowsmanaut wrote:Anyway.. the majority of vote related contests are a popularity contest.. including those for running a country..
I wrote:Might as well teach them early it's all about connections and not ability, though, right?