I've started doing some work on DMCodex again. I've been looking at adding a search facility to the site, but to do so I need to completely restructure the database -- it's not really accessible for searches in its current format. But.... this is a lot of work and will probably add several weeks to the development. The flipside of course, is that it will be easy to search for anything, and as the site will eventually grow quite large, this facility will probably be essential.
So, please answer the poll above! 7 days only!
Dungeon Master Codex Functionality
Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
- ChristopheF
- Encyclopedist
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 1999 2:36 pm
- Location: France
- Contact:
I don't need a search facility: I will read everything anyway!
You can still add it later.
Are you sure google will not be able to index your site?
You can still add it later.
Are you sure google will not be able to index your site?
Christophe - Dungeon Master Encyclopaedia
- PicturesInTheDark
- Arch Master
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:47 pm
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- PicturesInTheDark
- Arch Master
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:47 pm
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Gambit37
- Should eat more pies
- Posts: 13720
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2000 1:57 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Contact:
Just to clarify, PitD, about the Codex. I'm not trying to get "every last bit of information" -- if that were the case, I'd end up duplicating the Encyclopedia. But I am trying to get lots of information about the background to the development of DM, and info about FTL.
I'm not really that interested in making a technical document about the inner workings of the game, and besides Christophe has done a great job on that already.
I'm not really that interested in making a technical document about the inner workings of the game, and besides Christophe has done a great job on that already.
- PicturesInTheDark
- Arch Master
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 4:47 pm
- Location: Vienna, Austria
We're probably meaning the same but talking in different directions. (English is not my native language, so although it's pretty good it may sound awkward or have the wrong meaning at times).
I was referring to the parts I've seen so far - monster compendium for example, which provides very detailed and quite different information than at the Encyclopedia, which is I completely agree a very valuable resource in itself and does not need copying. But to find out that many details you must have been digging in various files for a long time - that's were the assumption came from you tried to do it as perfect as possible.
Was rather meant as a compliment.
Regards, PitD
I was referring to the parts I've seen so far - monster compendium for example, which provides very detailed and quite different information than at the Encyclopedia, which is I completely agree a very valuable resource in itself and does not need copying. But to find out that many details you must have been digging in various files for a long time - that's were the assumption came from you tried to do it as perfect as possible.
Was rather meant as a compliment.
Regards, PitD