Flames about level numbering scheme
Moderator: Ameena
Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting. You may
to help finance the hosting costs of this forum.
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting. You may

I disagree with Paul a little. Since we want a structure that fits the reality we perceive, the labelling is not solely consensual. It depends on the structure of what we perceive.
Besides "0", "1", "first" refer to already existing structures. So the point is about wether the referred structure fits the perceived structure.
As for the meaning of zero, I can think easily of cases were it doesn't mean "nothing". Like in coordinates, indexes (which is the case of the levels of the dungeon), or w00t.
Now, should we add the "giraffe" option to the poll? I'd vote for it!
Besides "0", "1", "first" refer to already existing structures. So the point is about wether the referred structure fits the perceived structure.
As for the meaning of zero, I can think easily of cases were it doesn't mean "nothing". Like in coordinates, indexes (which is the case of the levels of the dungeon), or w00t.
Now, should we add the "giraffe" option to the poll? I'd vote for it!
The levels should all have distinct human readable names burnt firmly into the depths of the dungeon so the numbers could all be forgotten. We'd just say the Hall of Champions or the Dragon's Den or The One With All Those #!"#¤& Scorpions. Everyone would be happy happy joy joy and play DM happily ever after. 
