Custom Dungeons
Moderator: Ameena
Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
-
- Novice
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:50 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
- Contact:
Custom Dungeons
Hi,
I have read in many posts about custom dungeons created by users (e.g. Conflux) where would I be able to get these from and would they work in RTC?
Thanks
James
I have read in many posts about custom dungeons created by users (e.g. Conflux) where would I be able to get these from and would they work in RTC?
Thanks
James
-
- Novice
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:50 pm
- Location: Glasgow, Scotland
- Contact:
James wrote:
My idea: replace one of the dead links on the main page by the "PLAY OUR DUNGEONS" link, leading to the Custom Dungeons forums, make that announcement red-green-yellow or so eyehurting shiny colours so anybody seen it when entering the main page.
Wil said:
maybe we should give a link to that forum (Custom dungeons forum) on the very main page, for example by replacing some dead link. IMHO it would be better because, when you enter the Forums first time and you`re absoluteley lame about DM, you can easily get lost (the whole forum has 52000 posts so far!). At least it was in my case, when I was searching for custom dungeons couple of days.Oops thanks, didnt even notice that forum
My idea: replace one of the dead links on the main page by the "PLAY OUR DUNGEONS" link, leading to the Custom Dungeons forums, make that announcement red-green-yellow or so eyehurting shiny colours so anybody seen it when entering the main page.
Wil said:
I tried and download those new dungeons. It isn't easy. This very forum is hard to come by and the files are scattered among subjects, sometimes there is a correction below...
If there was a distinct section in the download area, maybe there would be more players. Well I know it isn't an easy problem.
Spoiler
(\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/)
Spoiler
(@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@)
Spoiler
(>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<)
Umm, there is one, it points to the DME forums, but the first forum there is new dungeons. Or if you mean on these forums, then really i think a custom dungeon forum is as obvious as it gets. And really, we link to 'PLAY DUNGEONS' then need to link to 'ENGINES' etc.... the links and forums are fine as is I reckon. You found your feet, I don't think it is too hard
A quick note on compatability:
The CSBWin dungeons normally ship as a complete package - i.e. you should play them using the EXE provided as this is the version that it has been tested against and it may not work with a different version.
RTC dungeons are meant to be unzipped into the Modules directory of an existing RTC installation. There have been very few backwards compatability problems recently so most of them will work using the latest version (0.40).
I've played some of the old PC-DM dungeons by converting them to CSBWin (via CSBuild) with few problems. Yet to try converting any to RTC via DMute.
The CSBWin dungeons normally ship as a complete package - i.e. you should play them using the EXE provided as this is the version that it has been tested against and it may not work with a different version.
RTC dungeons are meant to be unzipped into the Modules directory of an existing RTC installation. There have been very few backwards compatability problems recently so most of them will work using the latest version (0.40).
I've played some of the old PC-DM dungeons by converting them to CSBWin (via CSBuild) with few problems. Yet to try converting any to RTC via DMute.
- Paul Stevens
- CSBwin Guru
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 6:00 pm
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin, USA
I very much like the idea of making these
games 'self-contained'. I have done this for a
few at:
http://www.dianneandpaul.net/CSBwin/Games/
and I would like to include more. But other folks
don't entirely agree with me on this subject. One
argument is that it requires a lot of web-space to
include copies of the runtime engine and graphics
files with each game. They are often duplicates.
My opinion is that today's disk drives are so big that
it is unnecessary to try and save space at the
expense of making things complicated (Does this
game work with that version??? etc).
So.....anyone who finds it difficult to download and
play a custom dungeon should pipe up and give me
more ammunition for my side of the argument.
games 'self-contained'. I have done this for a
few at:
http://www.dianneandpaul.net/CSBwin/Games/
and I would like to include more. But other folks
don't entirely agree with me on this subject. One
argument is that it requires a lot of web-space to
include copies of the runtime engine and graphics
files with each game. They are often duplicates.
My opinion is that today's disk drives are so big that
it is unnecessary to try and save space at the
expense of making things complicated (Does this
game work with that version??? etc).
So.....anyone who finds it difficult to download and
play a custom dungeon should pipe up and give me
more ammunition for my side of the argument.
- Paul Stevens
- CSBwin Guru
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 6:00 pm
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Actually, this SHOULD be true for CSBwin and I willSurely all dungeons should run on the newest stable platform?
accept bug reports to the contrary. But that was not
my argument. And now we find that particular
dungeons need particular Graphics.dat and sometime
CSBGraphics.dat. Not "the newest stable platform" but
rather a "particular platform". Other dungeons do not.
In any case, I prefer not to force a person unfamiliar
with the various files to locate and download more than
one piece in order to play a game. We have all seen the
chaos caused when people start mixing and matching
new dungeons with old graphics, etc. and the number of
messages that must be exchanged to sort it all out.
Especially when "Copy the graphics.dat to the same folder
as the executable" brings the reply "Huh?".
Honestly, that the reason I wasn't confident about using CSBWindows when I first re-discovered Dungeon Master.
Because it wasn't simple plug-and-play usability that RTC has, I thought it would be far too easy to make a mistake by trying to run it using the wrong version of the main program, then finding out I needed to download a different one for a different dungeon to work, etc.
Because it wasn't simple plug-and-play usability that RTC has, I thought it would be far too easy to make a mistake by trying to run it using the wrong version of the main program, then finding out I needed to download a different one for a different dungeon to work, etc.
RTC didn't have plug and play usability, you are coming into it too fresh. Different versions didn't used to be backwardsly compatible, and there are still bugs and issues for really old dungeons. But GG is trying to make it so you just download the core engine and then you should be able to play any file.
This is what CSBwin should be like - especially since the latest engine has been out for a while, and no one has needed tweaks - the latest should probably go to the encycolaedia now, and then all the dungeons could be be relased with bat file and module folder that is simply moved into the route directory with their own dungeon.dat, graphics.dat and CSBgraphics.dat etc as I thought was origially planned
This is what CSBwin should be like - especially since the latest engine has been out for a while, and no one has needed tweaks - the latest should probably go to the encycolaedia now, and then all the dungeons could be be relased with bat file and module folder that is simply moved into the route directory with their own dungeon.dat, graphics.dat and CSBgraphics.dat etc as I thought was origially planned
- Paul Stevens
- CSBwin Guru
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2001 6:00 pm
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin, USA