[Custom dungeon] Surgical Strike [RTC] [Sophia]
Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting.
When I found the magic map it did work at first. However, after walking around a bit it ceased operating and went blank, even after I returned to the very area where it did previously work. So if you don't have some devious dungeon mechanism replace the functional magic map with a non-functional one, I'd say it's a bug.
On a first glance Surgical Strike seems a bit like CSB in respect to non-linearity. I only ever got into CSB after having a couple of good maps and walkthroughs, yet I only really understood the dungeon years after having played through first on Amiga, even after seeing Christophe's super-perfect maps I took me quite a while and many more times of playing through to understand CSB's secrets.
So with neither the text file nor the magic map I find Surgical Strike too difficult to navigate in and thus will postpone playing it to some other time.
On a first glance Surgical Strike seems a bit like CSB in respect to non-linearity. I only ever got into CSB after having a couple of good maps and walkthroughs, yet I only really understood the dungeon years after having played through first on Amiga, even after seeing Christophe's super-perfect maps I took me quite a while and many more times of playing through to understand CSB's secrets.
So with neither the text file nor the magic map I find Surgical Strike too difficult to navigate in and thus will postpone playing it to some other time.
Parting is all we know from Heaven, and all we need of hell.
- George Gilbert
- Dungeon Master
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:04 am
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Was that in the *same* session of playing RTC. I.e. inbetween it working and not working, did you reload / restart the executable, or did you wander about the dungeon and suddenly it stopped working?Lunever wrote:When I found the magic map it did work at first. However, after walking around a bit it ceased operating and went blank, even after I returned to the very area where it did previously work. So if you don't have some devious dungeon mechanism replace the functional magic map with a non-functional one, I'd say it's a bug.
Yep - that's exactly what happens; the backwards incompatibility was only in the txt file - compiled RTC files weren't affected.Sophia wrote:It uses the default wallset, though, so I'd think the magic map would just show up using the default, like it always did.
where is the second saphire door? one i found near the elevator seat, but not a second, or takes the lock two keys and open another way?
meanwhile i found the blue dragon but don´t know what the next step is? is there a posibility to open the door at "projekt venom"?
found the chocolate lair, very funny, also the giggler bombs *g*
greetings
meanwhile i found the blue dragon but don´t know what the next step is? is there a posibility to open the door at "projekt venom"?
found the chocolate lair, very funny, also the giggler bombs *g*
greetings
- TheMormegil
- Adept
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 10:23 am
- Location: Wales
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
This dungeon can match the original ones easily! Reactor was very good, this one is INCREDIBLE!
I don't post anymore for reasons real-life.
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
I downloaded SS_2_2 from the link in your first post in this thread, but RTC (v0.49) says it`s SS_2_1. What`s going on?
Spoiler
(\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/)
Spoiler
(@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@)
Spoiler
(>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<)
- Gambit37
- Should eat more pies
- Posts: 13766
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2000 1:57 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Contact:
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
The version number wasn't updated. Plus you want to use RTC v0.37 to play it -- it'll do weird things in newer versions of RTC.
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
ha! I didn`t knew where to find the oldest RTC, so I picked up a newest one. What are the weirdnesses? I haven`t noticed any.
Spoiler
(\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/)
Spoiler
(@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@)
Spoiler
(>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<)
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
ooh, ok , thanx Gambit!
Though I haven`t noticed any weird things, except for the red scorpions attacking me from a distance!!!
But... where can I get old RTC v0.37? Also, if I find it, can I play old saves *(those saved in RTC 0.49)?
Though I haven`t noticed any weird things, except for the red scorpions attacking me from a distance!!!
But... where can I get old RTC v0.37? Also, if I find it, can I play old saves *(those saved in RTC 0.49)?
Spoiler
(\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/)
Spoiler
(@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@)
Spoiler
(>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<)
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
I put the way to get old engines up in the liost of dungeons thread
You probably can't play newer saves under old engines
You probably can't play newer saves under old engines
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
Thanx Beo!
But under RTC v0.39 it still says it`s SS v.2.1, not 2.2 ! Maybe Sophia gave the bad link?
But under RTC v0.39 it still says it`s SS v.2.1, not 2.2 ! Maybe Sophia gave the bad link?
Spoiler
(\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/) (\__/)
Spoiler
(@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@) (@.@)
Spoiler
(>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<) (>s<)
Re: (RTC) New Dungeon! Surgical Strike (2.2)
As Gambit said, the version number encoded in the text file was not updated. The file is v2.2, it's just labelled interanlly as 2.1. It' doesn't matter what engine you run it under, the labelling stays the same. You should have the correct version.