Agreed - we are obviously just passionately arguing about the right way for that to happen, as you say and as I hope everyone arguing realises you invest alot here. No one is shouting down your points on the merit or you personally - they merely have a passionate view on the subject too. That worries me, since if it is even partially based on emotional and not logical feeling, and yet we haven't had a debate or argument about it before, then it may mean what has happened previously been going on has worked and what is proposed now .Gambit wrote:it's only right and fair that everyone should be allowed to enjoy the forums equally
That of course might not have been true, but it seems the only hidden feelings that have come up in this debate is what adamo mentioned, about we haven't supported non-english translations enough - no one has passionately said they hated exclusive posts, merely that they have just ignored them
You feel that we should be inclusive all the time for all to equally enjoy the forum, which is valid. I saw it that, to equally enjoy the forum in a small community, we can all instead be equally exclusive in small amounts, as long as it is different people being exclusive for different reasons. A flashchat or forum runnign joke, a non-english chat, etc is fine as long as it happens in one place once, with different poeple. In that regard it is more the duty of all us regualrs, not non-english speakers, to ensure we don't get too carried away in others' threads outwith normal topics. Again, Gambit you have been the best of us to point this out when we don't notice it.
I think that while no one would complain, insisting on a common language all the time is inviting a constant niggle for all non-english speakers that may harm the forum in the background, while non-english posts are a temporary niggle to some of us, that in the end only harm only the posters because we won't reply and they don't get full community attention.
There will be times when we might accidentally delete a genuine poster if he posts in a language no one knows and translates - I'm not completely liberal, I'd be guilty of doing just that to ensure they weren't a spammer. I just try to make sure that the guildelines around and the ones I stick to myself err on the side of caution and friendliness.Gambit wrote:we may as well not have any moderators
I guess you and I have said our bit, cows obviously has a more important thing to deal with right now than this, so I guess we can leave it to the other mods and the rest of the forum to say anything else they feel. We can pick this up again tomorrow if it is felt that a change is needed.
AS we were meaning we have a range of people with a range of feelings, thoughts, and knowledge as admins and mods who can ensure that we aren't excluding people - you are seen as a rules person merely because you tend to take on that difficult task more than the rest of us to ensure the forum and people can communicate freely without being irritated or mis-understood or expluded. I just hope that because we have a range of passionate opinions, that means we manage to muddle through to a good correct path. I think voting for one extreme or another invites the problems you and I have both outlined.beowuuf wrote:Anyway, as we were!
Anyway, goodnight for now! I've said too much and too little I think
