[Not a bug] Keys go through portcullis

Messages are moved here (should anyone ever want to see them again) once they are no longer applicable to the current version (e.g. suggestions that have been implemented or bugs that have been fixed).

Moderator: George Gilbert

Forum rules
Please read the Forum rules and policies before posting. You may Image to help finance the hosting costs of this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sophia
Concise and Honest
Posts: 4307
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:50 pm
Location: Nowhere in particular
Contact:

[Not a bug] Keys go through portcullis

Post by Sophia »

Lunever's comment reminds me of another issue related to doors and small objects:

I am pretty sure DM did not allow keys to go through, because it would be way too easy to make the game unsolvable. Throw the key you need through the door-- game over.
User avatar
THOM
Artisan
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:22 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Post by THOM »

who is so stupid to throw a key away???

and IF someone IS - owe himself
User avatar
linflas
My other avatar is gay
Posts: 2445
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2003 9:58 pm
Location: Lille, France
Contact:

Post by linflas »

nice idea for another "do something stupid" puzzle ;)
User avatar
Lunever
Grand Druid
Posts: 2712
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 4:47 pm

Post by Lunever »

Stupidity is not the point here: The engine should avoid the creation of accidentally unsolvable savegames for consistency and stability reasons.
Parting is all we know from Heaven, and all we need of hell.
User avatar
Gambit37
Should eat more pies
Posts: 13773
Joined: Wed May 31, 2000 1:57 pm
Location: Location, Location
Contact:

Post by Gambit37 »

Yup, I agree, FTL made sure that stupid players wouldn't screw up the game for themselves. RTC should respect this.
User avatar
beowuuf
Archmastiff
Posts: 20686
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 2:00 pm
Location: Basingstoke, UK

Post by beowuuf »

Oh, what if i make any dungeon with a thrown weapon as a clue item? That can create an insoluable game!

While I could see it in minor circumstances (you mean to put the key in the keyhole and miss and throw it through a door, assumeing someone desins keyholes in doors) or you need to free your action hand quick to get a potion down someone's neck and throw the key, really, why limit for stupidity at costing a designer a cool trick?

Will pits that have no open areas around them now be disapllowed and closed if the party isn't carryign a grapel? Will the game engine stop itself from saving if a badly injured party save while facing a monster just about to attack?

RTC has multiple slots, you can save as often as you like, really if you throw a key through a door have the sense to restart! I personally think small items should be able to get thrown through doors, keys, coins, etc

</rant>
User avatar
Sophia
Concise and Honest
Posts: 4307
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:50 pm
Location: Nowhere in particular
Contact:

Post by Sophia »

The title of this thread is "Things in RTC that do not work as expected (compared to Dungeon Master)," which is what this is. Beyond that, there are decent points on both sides!

However, please note that in DM and CSB (and SS!) if an item is required to unlock a pit, the pit is always on a corner or in front of other pits. They were thinking of considerations like this.
User avatar
beowuuf
Archmastiff
Posts: 20686
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 2:00 pm
Location: Basingstoke, UK

Post by beowuuf »

I guess as long as there was a 'key_small' version of each that can be used for non DM/CSB games it would be alright...
User avatar
Sophia
Concise and Honest
Posts: 4307
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:50 pm
Location: Nowhere in particular
Contact:

Post by Sophia »

Cloned versions of doors can be set to allow missiles through. Perhaps a flag could be added to allow other things, as well.
User avatar
beowuuf
Archmastiff
Posts: 20686
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 2:00 pm
Location: Basingstoke, UK

Post by beowuuf »

Like them being evil monsters? : )
User avatar
George Gilbert
Dungeon Master
Posts: 3022
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2000 11:04 am
Location: London, England
Contact:

Re: Keys go through portcullis

Post by George Gilbert »

Sophia wrote:Lunever's comment reminds me of another issue related to doors and small objects:

I am pretty sure DM did not allow keys to go through, because it would be way too easy to make the game unsolvable. Throw the key you need through the door-- game over.
Is this a bug?

I've just tried it and can't throw objects which aren't missiles through doors in RTC either. I've also had a look at the source code and can't see how a key could possibly go through a portcullis.

Are you just making up bugs now based on pure speculation or do you have a concrete example? :wink:
User avatar
Lunever
Grand Druid
Posts: 2712
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2002 4:47 pm

Post by Lunever »

My original request at http://www.dungeon-master.com/forum/vie ... highlight= refered solely to missiles. Since I didn't bring up the question about keys passing through I didn't test the keys' behaviour and took the information from this thread for granted.

But even if that should be an accidentaly wrong bug-report I have to agree: Allowing a dungeon designer to customize the "item-transparency" of a door would allow for a broader range of interesting puzzles and thus would be cool to be implemented.
Parting is all we know from Heaven, and all we need of hell.
User avatar
Sophia
Concise and Honest
Posts: 4307
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:50 pm
Location: Nowhere in particular
Contact:

Re: Keys go through portcullis

Post by Sophia »

George Gilbert wrote:Is this a bug?

I've just tried it and can't throw objects which aren't missiles through doors in RTC either. I've also had a look at the source code and can't see how a key could possibly go through a portcullis.

Are you just making up bugs now based on pure speculation or do you have a concrete example?
At one point, I am pretty sure you could throw keys through a door. I remember considering that when I was designing Reactor. However, that was ages (if not a bit more) ago!

That situation just popped back into my head reading Lunever's thread, though. I didn't re-test it. If it's already been fixed in the current version (and likely has been fixed for quite some time...), then my mistake. :)

The alternative, is, of course, that I'm simply losing it... but that would be less interesting. :wink:
Post Reply